Asking for fetish isn’t scene critique
And, when you look at the studio’s forum pages…they serve a needed purpose. But, a lot of it is—understandably—consumers who are lobbying for their particular fetish, e.g. MORE ANAL DERP DERP! You guys are terrible, the last three scenes didn’t have a creampmie! I’m unsubscribing, man!
Well, that doesn’t constitute a critique review. It’s just some horny guy with extremely specific pornographic desires.
This topic has been on my mind a bit because some consumers act like if a studio doesn’t feature __________ niche that it’s an unworthy studio. Let’s just be honest. That’s a stupid point of view. No VR porn studio can be everything to everybody. If you want to critique the studio, your criticism should concern the optical experience and similar matters. Let’s just give an example. I fucking love Latina women! I said it! I fucking love them! But, if CzechVR doesn’t have many Latina women fuck for them…well, that doesn’t make CVR shit…it means, check out VR Latina, man!
With that said, a studio I’d LOVE TO SEE enter the VR SPACE is SPORTY SLUT! BRING IT ON SPORTY SLUT! I fucking love this stuff!
VR porn coverage is a shit show these days
Putting aside the actual VR porn studios…the sort of secondary, auxiliary coverage of it is an absolute shit show these days. That’s to say: there really isn’t any actual, legitimate coverage of it these days. If you look at 2D porn, there’s a vast infrastructure that really analyzes this shit. With VR porn, there’s crooked Reddit with corrupt moderators, “forums”…and, fuck it…you already know this world is a corrupt and disappointing motherfucker, don’t you? And, Google rankings…Google lets you know which of these motherfuckers is best at buying links…
…sorry, you’re not supposed to say that, but…it is what it is, man…